Not mononucleosis. Monochrome.
I miss film. I miss the smell of developer. I miss contact sheets. I miss working in the dark, a boombox in the background playing classic rock. I miss stumbling over my feet to change the station when Christopher Cross sings either of his two hits (Sailing and Theme from Arthur for the non-cognoscenti of Christopher’s large canon).
I miss dodging and burning. I miss cutting out shapes from shoebox cardboard. I miss the hum of the fan cooling the light in the enlarger. I miss the snick of the contrast filters sliding in and out of their frames. I miss the whisper of the paper tray sliding around on the enlarger platen to get the framing right.
I miss giant square negatives.
I miss incredibly toxic chemicals like selenium. I miss negatives hanging from the floor joists in the basement like very ineffective fly paper. I miss hanging out with Jim while we do all this stuff. My guess is the chemicals are all expired now since we both moved to digital for the most part.
These images you see are from contact sheets, so they’re not Photoshopped or doctored up. They’re what we used to start with. I miss that. I know that many of my friends are digital and use Photoshop like I used cardboard and my hands to dodge and burn, adjust contrast with a click instead of a snick, and see exactly what you’re getting within seconds. No test prints, no approximations.
And that is absolutely awesome. I wish I had your skills, as 90% of what I shoot is still digital. Maybe 98%. Either way, let me be most emphatic — digital is the medium, and the skill is still behind the camera. My friends who were good photographers before digital are still good. Great ones are still great.
I’m just saying I miss the darkroom.
There is a Nikon F5 at the camera store. They want $400. My guess is that I could trade in my N90s and a hundred bucks and get it. I will wait for Spring, because it will still be there, I’m sure, and it might be cheaper. The lenses don’t get cheaper, but you can buy a good paperweight and it’ll cost more than some film camera bodies.
I have a nice Canon F1 in the basement. It’s not getting dusty, but its bag is covered with a light dusting of drywall mud from our recent basement work. Nice lenses too, but they’re Canon lenses. Screws vs. bayonets, one of the great divides, like Orthodoxy vs. Reformation. Or Coke vs. Pepsi. Or Ginger vs. Mary Ann.
As for me and my house, Coke (Zero) and Mary Ann, and strange combination of orthodoxy and reformation. Leave it to me to complicate a dichotomy.
I will shoot more Ilford Delta 400 (but shot at 320) in the coming year. Not a resolution, just a statement of fact.
Respectfully submitted,
Canoelover
I have one lightweight 35mm body for when I feel the need. A Nikon N65. I pair it up with a fast prime and I’m ready to go. That F5 is a beast. You could find an F100 for about half the price at KEH.com and save about half the weight.
Good comparison
http://www.bythom.com/f100.htm
All good cameras though.
What’s behind the lens is what matters most.
Hooray for 35mm, I love the photos and can’t wait to see more. This year I will be using a Blackbird Fly Camera http://blackbirdflycamera.com/ (I am so excited).
Melissa
I don’t miss it too much. Although, I recently turned my bathroom into a darkroom to load pinhole cameras for solargraphy. Have you tried Adobe Lightroom for your digital stuff? It feels much more like a darkroom to me than Photoshop.
The only film camera I kept was a FM3a. It’s still my favorite camera. I’d love to see a digital version of it, because I haven’t run film through it for about seven years.
I wish I’d had the opportunity to learn darkroom skills. I keep kicking around the idea of getting into it enough to develop my negatives when I shoot with my rangefinder, but it is easy and convenient to just drop them off and pick them up a week later.
Plus one for Ilford Delta 400. It is the only film I shoot anymore.